Blog Layout

First Things First

Oct 06, 2020

“The buck stops here” is a promise that responsibility will not be passed on to anyone else. It is a phrase most commonly  attributed to former President Harry S. Truman (1945-1953). It was his statement that he accepted personal responsibility for the way the country was governed.


History, however, indicates that the phrase was the mantra for Colonel A.B. Warfield, Commandant of the Lathrop Holding & 
Reconsignment depot at Stockton, CA. The Phrase Finder at states that an October 1942 story in the Reno Evening Gazette about the Colonel shows a picture of him at his desk with the sign prominently displayed for all who entered his office to see.


Title, position and opportunity do not mitigate the relevance of history. The executive Power vested in the office of the President of the United States is delineated in Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution. It lays out how long a President is to  serve, who has final authority to elect a President, the minimum qualifications to hold office and how that person can be removed from office other than by way of term limits.


The authority vested in the office is found in Article II, Section 2. The exclusive authority of the President includes being the  Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, and of the Militia of the several States, the purveyor of reprieves and pardons against the United States. The President can by and with the advice and consent of the Senate make treaties, appoint ambassadors, ministers and consuls, judges to the Supreme Court and all other appointments established by law.


Governors on the other hand, and particularly in North Carolina, have a broader scope of authority. Article III, Section 1  states that the executive power of the State shall be vested in the Governor. That executive power includes preparing and recommending a balanced budget to the General Assembly, administering the balanced budget approved by the General Assembly, faithful execution of laws, serving as Commander and Chief of state military forces, and granting reprieves, commutations and pardons. But it is Section 10 of the Article that strikes a distinctive chord. It states:


(10) Administrative reorganization. The General Assembly shall prescribe the functions, powers, and duties of the

administrative departments and agencies of the State and may alter them from time to time, but the Governor may

make such changes in the allocation of offices and agencies and in the allocation of those functions, powers, and

duties as he considers necessary for efficient administration. If those changes affect existing law, they shall be set

forth in executive orders, which shall be submitted to the General Assembly not later than the sixtieth calendar day

of its session, and shall become effective and shall have the force of law upon adjournment sine die of the session,

unless specifically disapproved by resolution of either house of the General Assembly or specifically modified by

joint resolution of both houses of the General Assembly.


The debate over the right of states to enact laws and policies separate from the Federal government is as old as the nation itself. There was a time in the 19th century that this country was embroiled in a bloody dispute over the rights of states versus the greater national order. And it seems at times that that struggle continues. Our current competing political ideologies pit national well being with the support of government at odds with individualism and personal prosperity absent government involvement. We can see those differences played out on a state by state basis through policies and laws.


However, during this time of a global pandemic the very fabric of our society at peril. Some believe we are more a villain than a victim. Science has yet to understand the fundamental characteristics of the novel coronavirus. As such, we are all susceptible to exposure and harm. Unless and until a proven method of control or cure for the virus is secured, we must do the next best thing. Governors and mayors around the country have endorsed the scientific plea to practice social distancing. It is the simplest thing we can all do to help retard the spread. However, people being who they are at times need guidance. Governors have the authority and obligation to give that guidance. The President does not have the authority to override state and local orders. Their words are merely advisory. Ironically, this is a time when the States’ Rights argument is the strongest argument for protecting the public. We need to allow our elected leadership to manage this dilemma and coordinate with the medical research community to fully understand the virus at hand and craft a medical solution. It takes data and patience. The scientific method is not predicated upon market forces. What we are experiencing is foremost a health crisis. The economic distress we are having is collateral damage.


However, the irony in the pot thickens. This is certainly the time for national leadership to join forces with state leadership to coordinate a strategy to rescue the entire country from the clutches of the pandemic. We are not experiencing a national response strategy based upon human welfare. That focus seems to be on market viability. The novel coronavirus will not stop spreading to allow people to go back to work. The virus has no concern for your bills or your profits. We need a national strategy that will get us through that which we can control. Having to create economic support mechanisms to help people endure is a limited response while the research community figures out who to control or stop the life cycle of the coronavirus.


So, as you ponder where the buck stops, keep in mind that our Governors carry the weight of our communities on their shoulders. Keep in mind that while states have the ability to implement basic policies to protect their own, we are a nation of states that at certain times need to collectively plan and implement processes and policies to protect our national fabric.


This certainly is one of those times. Unsubstantiated claims of authority only create confusion and anxiety. One must recognize and understand their true position and authority and seek to exercise it cooperatively to be most effective. Please keep that in mind as the election season draws near.

Thoughts from Henry Lancaster II

02 Mar, 2022
There is a phrase I am sure many of you have heard at one time or another: “hope springs eternal.” Another way to put it is a famous literary query “if Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?” Sixty-five years ago this May 17th, na-tional civil rights leaders called for a rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial hoping to get the federal government to fulfill the promise of the Brown v. Board of Education decision with supporting enabling legislation (more specifi-cally the Civil Rights of 1957 which, by the way, was filibustered to defeat by Senator Strom Thurmond). A very young Martin Luther King, Jr. joined the litany of presenters that day as the last speaker. The very young King noted that the monumental Brown decision was met with opposition in open defiance from many states. One form of opposition he addressed was “all types of conniving methods that are still being used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters.” He stated that the “denial of this sacred right is the tragic be-trayal of the highest mandates of our democratic tradition.” The defenders of voting rights today echo the same message in their challenges to restrictions being legislated al-most daily across the country. Decades before King, American writer and bard, James Weldon Johnson, wrote about democracy in America stating that “[t]his country can have no more democracy than it accords and guaran-tees to the humblest and weakest citizen.” Both King and Johnson spoke of the fulfillment of the American govern-ance experiment as having to be inclusive and non-judgmental. They more than intimated that America cannot suc-ceed if it does not allow all its citizens to have a voice. King stated, “Give us the ballot, and we will no longer have to worry the federal government about our basic rights. Give us the ballot, and we will no longer plead to the federal government for passage of an anti-lynching law; we will by the power of our vote write the law on the statute books of the South and bring an end to the das-tardly acts of the hooded perpetrators of violence. Give us the ballot, and we will transform the salient misdeeds of bloodthirsty mobs into the calculated good deeds of orderly citizens. Give us the ballot, and we will fill our legislative halls with men of goodwill and send to the sacred halls of Congress men who will not sign a “Southern Manifesto” because of their devotion to the manifesto of justice. Give us the ballot, and we will place judges on the benches of the South who will do justly and love mercy, and we will place at the head of the southern states governors who will, who have felt not only the tang of the human, but the glow of the Divine.” Arguably, the United States Constitution was intended to be the beginning of a nation’s evolution not a marker in time to fit the interests of those “in charge” at the time. I say arguably because so many of the founding fathers and their successors were purveyors of our country’s original sin. Contradictions have ravaged our past. But over time however, amendments have been adopted to right the wayward ship. And it is those amendments that have ex-panded the nation’s contract with its citizens that all men are created equal and are endowed with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Voter suppression is hands down a breach of that contract. If one’s Second Amendment right to bear arms is con-sidered untouchable so should be another’s right to participate in structuring their governance. That is, a voter has the right to enter a polling place with the expectation that their vote can and will make a difference. If that voter is left with the impression in any way that the exercise of the right is mathematically insignificant for any reason other than their inability to rally like minded voters, then a breach has occurred. A breach of that magnitude is un-American. If hope truly springs eternal, it is because each election season has meaning for more than a privileged few. (References to Dr. King can be found at the King Research and Education Institute at Stanford University)
31 Dec, 2021
Listen to Henry's thoughts on current political events affecting North Carolina.
More Posts
Share by: